awaii Senator Mazie Hirono has been quietly continuing her practice of asking every federal judiciary nominee whether they have ever been accused of sexual misconduct for months now. And to anyone who would criticize her for it, or for her other pointed questions about their commitment to civil rights, Hirono has just two words: “F*** them!”

In an interview with NPR, Hirono, a Democrat, said her line of questioning isn’t to stoke the fires of partisan politics but to vet judges who “care about individual and civil rights.”

“If that’s considered liberal, as opposed to what I call justice and fairness, as I am wont to say, f*** them!” Hirono said.

Hirono first introduced questions about nominees’ histories with sexual misconduct in January, when she and other members of the Senate Judiciary Committee were holding a hearing for Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals nominee Kurt Engelhardt. During the hearing, Hirono asked him point-blank if he had ever “made unwanted requests for sexual favors or committed any verbal or physical harassment or assault of a sexual nature.”

Engelhardt said he’d never done any of those things. More importantly, he denied doing them under oath—which would mean that, should he or any other nominee lie to Hirono during their judiciary hearings about questions of harassment or assault, he or she would have perjured themselves.

Starting today, I’m asking nominees to our courts, under oath, whether or not they have a history of sexual assault or harassment. Like in other industries, our judges are in positions of power & #TimesUp.

“The nominee answered my questions and that was that,” Hirono said in a statement to Newsweek at the time. “And that is how it should be. I want nominees who come before me in the Senate to know that these questions are about to become normal.

“We all have a responsibility to take action to stop sexual harassment and assault, and create lasting cultural change,” Hirono continued. “This means keeping this issue on the front burner. Women have endured this behavior since time immemorial, and this line of questioning is a step I can take as a U.S. senator to hold accountable nominees who will be in positions of power.”

As a senator, Hirono was once known as Hawaii’s “good girl” politician, but she has quickly earned a different reputation in the Trump era, for being a “badass,” as NPR notes. She fights many of her battles on the judiciary committee—with rigorous questions for each Trump nominee on their professional record and personal histories—but she’s also taken on Trump’s anti-immigrant rhetoric and called out the president for being a “liar.” And she doesn’t back down from any of these statements or stances.

“As I tell my staff, people are getting screwed in this country every single second, minute, hour of the day,” she told NPR. “And, by our efforts, if we can decrease that number, we will be making a difference. We will be doing our jobs.”

So has Trump and the current Republican-controlled Congress brought out a certain spark in Hirono, or was she a “badass” all along?

“I always was,” Hirono told NPR. “I just wasn’t very noisy about it. I’ve been a fighter all my life. I just don’t look like that.”

Hawaii Senator Mazie Hirono has continued to ask President Donald Trump’s judicial nominees about whether they have ever been accused of sexual misconduct.AL DRAGO/GETTY IMAGES


For the show’s cold open, Alec Baldwin entered the fray with his latest Donald Trump skit, poking fun at the President-elect over his retweet of a 16-year-old boy’s support. During a “security briefing,” Baldwin’s character interrupted the session with “important” newѕ.

“Kellyanne,” Baldwin rasped, “I just retweeted the the best tweet. I mean, wow,” he gushed.

“What a great, smart tweet. This could not wait. It was from a young man named Seth, He’s 16, he’s in high school, and I really did retweet him,” he insisted. “Seriously. This is real.” Kate McKinnon, playing Conaway, stared vacantly into the camera and said, “He really did do this.”

The genuine Donald Trump didn’t squander whenever tweeting about the portray, sharing his disappointment on, where else, Twitter.

Is Jennifer Aniston propelling a dressing accumulation with HSN? Another report asserts she’s collaborating with Sheryl Crow, who as of now has a line with the Home Shopping Network. However, Gossip Cop has only learned Aniston isn’t engaged with any organization.

The genuine Donald Trump didn’t ѕquander whenever tweeting about the portray, sharing his disappointment on, where else, Twitter.

Is Jennifer Aniston propelling a dressing accumulation with HSN? Another report asserts she’s collaborating with Sheryl Crow, who as of now has a line with the Home Shopping Network. However, Gossip Cop has only learned Aniston isn’t engaged with any organization.

The distribution takes note of this implied venture is still in the “arranging stages,” which could be the reason there are no specifics given about what kind of attire Aniston and Crow would plan or when the dress may make a big appearance. More probable, however, the genuine reason this article is so broad and ambiguous is on the grounds that there’s no such gathering in progress.

Nobody with whom Gossip Cop talked, including Aniston’s rep, could affirm any plans to complete a line for HSN. Truth be told, we’re informed that the star’s specialists and administrator have not had any talks about this claimed profession move.

Also, there’s further motivation to question the authenticity of this gathered scoop: OK! has a past loathsome reputation with regards to covering Aniston. The newspaper has invested years distributing false pregnancy reports about the on-screen character, including a main story two months prior that dishonestly asserted Aniston was expecting a “supernatural occurrence infant at 48.”

The magazine that doesn’t care to be accurate on such important topics is not going to be the outlet that breaks real news about the ѕtar’s career..


At the point when will individuals learn not to post for their entire life’s subtle elements via web-based networking media?

A British Muslim welfare beneficiary has been discovered defrauding the British citizens out of over $72,000 in welfare benefits. She had guaranteed that she was down and out, marginally scratching by, and was just ready to place nourishment in her stomach because of the halal dinners arranged for her by her nearby mosque.

Additionally burrowing by British experts uncovered that Reid had 19 financial balances holding over $260,000.

Carina Reid, age 32, had been tricking the legislature for a considerable length of time with her stratagem, until the point when specialists looked at her Facebook page, and understood that the tricky Ms. Reid was driving a remarkable twofold life.

A scrutiny of Reid’s Facebook account demonstrated that she was a model and businessperson (past her other activity as trick craftsman). The welfare installments she got helped pay for her luxurious way of life, which included treks to Dubai and other lavish regions, champagne, and Five-star lodgings.

Reid frequently posted pictures of herself eating in gourmet eateries, relaxing poolside at outlandish resorts, or going on helicopter rides.

Reid’s welfare trick on the British citizens started in 2009 when she expressed that a boutique she was working was creating low incomes.

A neighbor on King’s Road in Chelsea stated: “It’s a stun. We scarcely observed her on account of her jetset way of life. She was continually celebrating and just gave the impression of being extremely fruitful.”

Reid was so difficult up for cash that she could put down a $29,000 store on an extravagance level in Chelsea, and in addition spending nearly $168,000 on property buys in Dubai.

Her case was heard by the Islesworth Crown Court, where, as indicated by the Evening Standard, she pled liable to “nine charges of untrustworthily guaranteeing lodging advantage and gathering tax break.” She was condemned to three years in jail.

The Evening Standard reported that at condemning, Judge Douglas Marks Moore summed up Reid’s trick as “refined” and “planned.”

The judge additionally noticed that Reid’s plan was “not an inactive misrepresentation,” similarly as with every finish of a welfare benefits shape, there was a “positive exhibit to beguile.”

Unashamed to the end, Reid has not paid back any of the citizen monies she bilked. She even had the nerve to discount a portion of her excursions as business preparing. She likewise guaranteed that a portion of her movements were paid for by men and companions.

Exercise One: Don’t endeavor to trick the administration and cheat citizens. That is simply off-base.

Exercise Two: If you choose not to pursue Lesson One, don’t flaunt your stream set way of life and post pictures to demonstrate it via web-based networking media. That is simply inept.

New Poll Finds That The Majority Side With Trump… Are You One Of Them?@NEVADA POST 365

The mainstream media want you to know that the majority of the US citizens are against Trump’s executive orders, but that iѕ not the truth! Whoa, that’s the “first” time the mainstream media lies. A new poll on Fox News shows that the majority of Americans do not see Trump’s executive order as a “Muslim ban”.

The poll says, 56 percent of the registered voters deemed the order a ” terrorist hot spot restriction,” while 37 percent said it is more likely “Muslim Ban.”

Although more than half of the those polled do not believe the move was not an attempt to discriminate based on religion, a majority of the country disapproves of the executive order. Forty-six percent supported Trump’s Jan. 27 immigration order, according to Washington Examiner.

1,013 registered voters nationwide voted through landline and cellphone interviews. The poll was conducted by the Anderson Robbins Research and Shaw & Company Research. The survey’s margin of error was three percentage points for all registered voters.

Majority has always ѕided with Trump. All true patriotic Americans. And yes, we side with President Trump! Let him fix this and get on with the ban, he knows what he is doing!
Donald Trump hasn’t even gotten started yet and the majority sides with him. And they’re right! Let’s share this with your friends and  let them know that the MSM сan’t be trusted no more!

Grassley Refers Latest Kavanaugh Accuser For Criminal Prosecution… “Lying and Obstructing”

The Honorable Judge Brett Kavanaugh faced an onslaught of ridiculous allegations since the first one from Dr. Christine Ford emerged earlier this month. The ones that came after were even more ludicrous than the original.

Besides the continued trashing of Kavanaugh’s good name and character, the extra allegations present authorities with a lot more work to sort out… and rule out. But today, the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee is about to teach an accuser” a major legal lesson…

Breitbart reports:

The Senate Judiciary Committee made a criminal referral Saturday for the Rhode Island man who claimed Judge Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted his friend on a boat in 1985, asking that he be prosecuted for lying to Congress.

In a letter, Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) asks Attorney General Jeff Sessions and FBI Director Christopher Wray that the accuser, whose name was redacted, be investigated for “potential violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 and 1505, for materially false statements [he] made to the Committee as part of its investigation of allegations against Judge Kavanaugh.”

The accuser’s name has been redacted in all Senate documents since this allegation first became public with the release of a transcript from Kavanaugh’s Monday conference call under penalty of felony, in which he cateogorically denied it. Journalists, however, were quickly able to find the social media account referenced along with the allegation. The account identified itself as “Jeffrey Catalan” and had been used to make calls for President Donald Trump to be overthrown by a military coup and accusations the president had murdered someone in 1983. The account describes its owner as a “Graphic Artist, Artist, photography and writer. Hippie, First Responder, Father and Grandpa” from Tiverton, Rhode Island.

The Jeffrey Catalan account promptly retracted the allegation Wednesday night, claiming he made “a mistake” when he claimed a 20-year-old Judge Kavanuagh sexually assaulted a woman on a boat and that he then severely beat Kavanaugh for it. Grassley’s Saturday letter references this retraction, confirming the identification of the accuser as “Jeffrey Catalan,” although, because of the redaction, it is still not clear if that is the man’s real name.

With Catalan’s retraction, it was clear enough to Grassley that the man had likely lied to Senator Whitehouse. Lying to congressional staff about an official matter they are investigating and deliberately obstructing a congressional investigation are both felonies, even when the intentionally misleading statements are not made under oath.

Let us know in the comments if you think this accuser should be held legally responsible for his role in tarnishing the good name of Judge Kavanaugh!

Feinstein in HOT WATER After Tom Cotton Announces She’ll be Investigated for Leaks

During a Sunday interview with CBS, Republican Senator Tom Cotton announced that Senator Dianne Feinstein and her office will be investigated for leaking Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford’s letter, after receiving it in late July.

Cotton said that Senator Feinstein, her office staffers, and Ford’s own lawyers will face investigations for their handling of the event, which has become the focal point of the media for the past two weeks.

“[Ford’s] lawyers are going to face a D.C. bar investigation into their misconduct,” Cotton said, adding, “Dianne Feinstein and her staff are going to face an investigation for why they leaked that.”

The Arkansas Senator went on to condemn Democrats for their treatment of Ford, stating, “They have betrayed her. She has been victimized by Democrats,” who he said were “on a search-and-destroy mission for Brett Kavanaugh.”

From The Daily Caller:

Arkansas Republican Sen. Tom Cotton said Dianne Feinstein’s office will be investigated for the leak of Christine Blasey Ford’s letter, a message she explicitly requested be kept confidential.

Speaking Sunday on CBS’ “Face the Nation,” Cotton told host John Dickerson that, not only will Feinstein and her staffers be investigated for the leak of Ford’s confidential letter, but that Ford’s lawyers will also face a Washington, D.C., bar investigation for allegedly not informing her that Senate Judiciary Committee staffers were willing to travel to California to interview her about her allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

“Those lawyers are going to face a D.C. bar investigation into their misconduct. Dianne Feinstein and her staff is going to face an investigation for why they leaked that. All of this could have been done discreetly, it happens hundreds of times … hundreds of times every year in the Judiciary Committee,” the Arkansas Republican said during his exchange with Dickerson.

Feinstein — who serves as the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee — received Ford’s letter in July, describing an alleged encounter with Kavanaugh. Despite requesting anonymity, the letter was leaked to the press in September. Feinstein has denied any involvement in the leak.

During her Senate testimony on Thursday, Ford revealed that she was unaware committee staffers had offered to meet her in private in California, a move that would have avoided a public hearing. Ford’s lawyers had apparently kept her unaware of the offer.

Cotton said Ford has been “victimized” by Democrats who have sought to exploit her allegations for political gain, many of whom had announced their opposition to President Donald Trump’s nominee before the allegations became public.

ave betrayed her,” he stated on CBS. “She has been victimized by Democrats … on a search-and-destroy mission for Brett Kavanaugh.”
In a compromise with Senate Democrats, Republicans have green-lighted a week-long FBI investigation into accusations of sexual misconduct into Kavanaugh.

Sen. Cory Booker Facing Expulsion from US Senate for Ethics Violations

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it hand-delivered a letter to the chairman and co-chairman of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Ethics calling for an investigation into Senator Cory Booker’s (D-NJ) admitted violation Senate rules by releasing confidential records through his social media accounts. Senator Booker faces expulsion from the Senate for his violation of the rules.

Sen. Booker admitted to violating Senate rules when he issued a tweet on Friday, September 7 saying:

Weds—I broke committee rules by reading from “committee confidential” docs.

Sen. Booker then posted the following entry on his Facebook account on Saturday, September 9:

And the classification of many documents as “Committee Confidential” is a sham… I willfully violate these sham rules. I fully accept any consequences that might arise from my actions including expulsion.

Additionally, Sen. Booker uploaded Committee Confidential records to a publicly accessible Dropbox account with the heading “Booker Confidential  – Kavanaugh Hearing Documents”.

“Senator Booker, in an absurd invocation of ‘Spartacus,’ explicitly invited his expulsion from the Senate in his egregious violation of the rules and contempt for the rule of law and the Constitution,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Will the Senate assert the rule of law in the Booker case or allow mob rule to be the new standard?”

The Judicial Watch complaint is reprinted below:

Dear Chairman Isakson and Co-Chairman Coons:

Judicial Watch, Inc. in a non-profit, non-partisan educational foundation that promotes transparency, accountability, and integrity in government and fidelity to the rule of law. We regularly monitor congressional ethics issues as part of our anticorruption mission.

Sen. Cory Booker admitted to violating Senate rules when he issued a tweet on Friday, September 7 saying:

Weds-I broke committee rules by reading from “committee confidential” docs.

Sen. Booker then posted the following entry on his Facebook account on Saturday, September 9:

And the classification of many documents as “Committee Confidential” is a sham … I willfully violate these sham rules. I fully accept any consequences that might arise from my actions including expulsion.

Sen. Booker uploaded Committee Confidential records to a publicly accessible Dropbox account with the heading “Booker Confidential – Kavanaugh Hearing Documents”

By publicly releasing Committee Confidential records, Sen. Booker appears to have violated provisions 5 and/or 6 of Rule 29 of the Standing Rules of the Senate (Rev. Jan. 24, 2013), which stipulate:

5.  Any Senator, officer or employee of the Senate who shall disclose the secret or confidential business or proceedings of the Senate, including the business and proceedings of the committees, subcommittees and offices of the Senate shall be liable, if a Senator, to suffer expulsion from the body; and if an officer or employee, to dismissal from the service of the Senate, and to punishment for contempt.

6.  Whenever, by the request of the Senate or any committee thereof, any documents or papers shall be communicated to the Senate by the President or the head of any department relating to any matter pending in the Senate, the proceedings in regard to which are secret or confidential under the rules, said documents and papers shall be considered as confidential, and shall not be disclosed without leave of the Senate.

We hereby requst that the Senate Ethics Committee conduct a preliminary investigation into whether Sen. Booker violated Senate Rules by releasing Committee Confidential records through his social media accounts.

Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

Senate staff talked to men who believe they, not Kavanaugh, had 1982 encounter with Ford, docs show

Two men have disclosed to Senate Judiciary Committee staff members that they trust they — not Judge Brett Kavanaugh — had the sexual experience with Christine Blasey Ford which is the premise of her rape assertion against the Supreme Court chosen one.

Reports discharged by greater part individuals from the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday evening tossed another wrinkle into the allegations against Kavanaugh, the prior night he and Ford are planned to affirm about the circumstance.

Republican individuals from the board discharged an outline course of events of staff exercises identified with the various sexual unfortunate behavior affirmations against Kavanaugh. The course of events incorporates a few visual cues that show two men have said Kavanaugh did not explicitly attack Christine Blasey Ford at a 1982 gathering — on the grounds that they did it.

Day by day Mail political manager David Martosko posted screen captures from the course of events on Twitter, featuring these key things.

HUGE! Christine Ford Published 2008 Article on Self-Hypnosis Used to Retrieve and “Create Artificial Situations”

Christine Ford has not turned over her specialist’s notes to the Senate with respect to her stifled recollections about Judge Kavanaugh mishandling her decades sooner.

This might be on account of if the recollections were uncovered through trance they would be “totally forbidden” in the official courtroom in numerous states, including New York and Maryland.

There were likewise allegations that Christine Ford was under a mesmerizing daze amid her declaration.

Presently this…

One of Christine Blasey Ford’s examination articles in 2008 incorporated an investigation on self-mesmerizing.

The act of self-mesmerizing is utilized to recover vital recollections and “make counterfeit circumstances.”