What’s She Hiding? Kavanaugh Accuser Hasn’t Turned Over Lie Detector Test – Now We Know Why

As the most dependable and adjusted news conglomeration benefit on the planet, RWN offers the accompanying data distributed by The Gateway Pundit

Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s lawyer Beth Wilkinson went on CUB News on Wednesday morning.

Wilkinson revealed to CBS the attorneys for Dr. Portage have not turned over the consequences of her lie finder test or her specialist’s notes to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Christine Ford is planned to affirm under pledge before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday morning.

Inclining: Conservatives Just Saved Kavanaugh Hours Before Accuser Testifies With INCREDIBLE Move

Note the principal question by liberal journalist Nora O’Donnell:

Nora O’Donnell: Is the proof mounting against your customer?

Beth Wilkinson: No, I wouldn’t state that, Nora. As you probably are aware those are proclamations that were made moderately as of late and tragically this is a claim from just about 36 years back. Furthermore, there was at the time no report which is justifiable.

Be that as it may, the first run through these charges became exposed the extent that we know from perusing the reports in the media, Dr. Portage revealed to her specialist and disclosed to her better half. They reported that there were notes and there was a lie indicator test however as I comprehend it they didn’t turn any of those over to the senate advisory group despite the fact that they were asked.

Along these lines, the data that would have demonstrated what she said at the simple first time when she uncovered these charges have not been swung over to the senate.

WATCH: Brett Kavanaugh’s lawyer Beth Wilkinson discloses to us that legal counselors for Dr. Portage have not turned over the consequences of her lie indicator test or her specialist’s notes to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

For the record… Nora O’Donnell was one of in excess of 60 liberal writers who was secretly meeting with the Hillary Clinton crusade before the 2016 decision.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *